Explosive dating report for 699 doc

06-Sep-2016 14:58 by 5 Comments

Explosive dating report for 699 doc - ananth yuko dating

The papyrus has now been examined by electrical engineering, chemistry and biology experts from Columbia University, Harvard University and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) who have declared that the parchment is indeed several hundred years old, according to The New York Times.Subsequent books have claimed Jesus fathered a child with Mary - or possibly had more offspring with a Kashmiri woman.

One interpretation of the papyrus is that if it is talking about the wife of Jesus, the document could cast doubt on a centuries old official representation of Mary Magdalene as a repentant whore and overturns the Christian ideal of sexual abstinence.Professor King speculated that the so-called 'Gospel of Jesus’ Wife' may have been thrown out 'because the ideas it contained flowed so strongly against the ascetic currents of the tides in which Christian practices and understandings of marriage and sexual intercourse were surging.'The document was originally carbon dated by the University of Arizona Accelerator Mass Spectrometry Laboratory to between 200 and 400 years before the birth of Jesus, while a second test by Harvard produced an average date of 741AD.Experts at Columbia University tested the ‘ancient’ ink using a technique called micro-Raman spectroscopy to examine its chemical composition before comparing it to other similar documents in its collection.•\ **2 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE COMMISSIONER OF PATENTS FOK THE YEAR 1890 WASHINGTON: GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE. Department op the Interior, United States Patent Office, Washington, D. To the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled : It is provided by section 494 of the Revised Statutes that — the Commissioner of Patents shall lay before Congress in the month of January, annually, a report giving a detailed statement of all moneys received for patents, for copies of records or draw- ings, or from any other source whatever; a detailed statement of all expenditures for contingent and miscellaneous expenses; a list of all patents which were granted during the preceding year, designating under proper heads the subjects of such patents; an alphabetical list of all the patentees, with their places of resi- dence; a list of all patents which have been extended during the year, and such other information of the condition of the Patent Office as may be useful to Congress or the public. The papyrus’ back side, or verso, is so badly damaged that only a few key words - 'my mother' and 'three'- were decipherable, but on the front side, or recto, Professor King gleaned eight fragmentary lines: A furious Vatican newspaper dismissed the find as a fake in an editorial by its editor, Giovanni Maria Vian who wrote a stinging piece entitled 'At any rate, a fake,' which questioned the document's authenticity.The new study, published in the Harvard Theological Review, revealed the results of the latest carbon dating tests to be carried out on the document, which was found to date to eighth century Egypt, around 400 years later than Professor King originally thought, The Boston Globe reported. I don’t buy the argument that this is sophisticated.

Additional tests showed that the ink’s chemical composition is consistent with other inks used by the ancient Egyptians, while microscopic imaging found no suspicious ink pooling that critics of the papyrus said was evidence of the ink being applied in more recent times. I think it could be done in an afternoon by an undergraduate student,’ he said.

Controversy: Karen King announced the finding at an international congress on Coptic studies in Rome in 2012 and the Vatican as well as others reacted furiously to some interpretations of the ancient fragment, which is written in Ancient Coptic ‘As a forgery, it is bad to the point of being farcical or fobbish. The provenance of the papyrus has also been questioned.

The owner of the document has asked to remain anonymous but said that he acquired the artefact along with five other papyri in 1999 from a collector who got them in the 1960s in East Germany.

But Professor King said: ‘I’m basically hoping that we can move past the issue of forgery to questions about the significance of this fragment for the history of Christianity, for thinking about questions like, “Why does Jesus being married, or not, even matter?

” Why is it that people had such an incredible reaction to this?

’The papyrus, which is roughly the size of a business card, appears to have been written much later than the gospels of the New Testament, which are considered to be the earliest and therefore the most reliable sources of information about the life of Christ.